When we share knowledge of a spiritual nature, there are several things that happen immediately:
1. Some of those who “discovered” it get furious that it is being shared without them getting credit and a piece of the action.
2. Others believe that this knowledge is so powerful that only a select group of initiates should have access to this data.
3. Others, of a “do gooder” nature want to protect people from being hurt by knowing this information.
4. There are those who will attack anything that shakes their stable data.
5. Others spread the information far and wide
As time goes on, several other things happen:
People in Group #1 will attempt to use legal means to put a cap on the dissemination and use of this knowledge. The management of the Church of Scientology has a long history of this behavior.
People in Group #2 and Group #3 will mount all sorts of disinformation campaigns to get others from looking at the data or using it.
People in Group #4 will attack the data using satire and scorn or will write scolding comments to blogs that share such data.
People in Group #5 may start using the data and create their own versions.
Unfortunately when the subject is spiritual entities, this data has been available for thousands of years and almost every culture has traditions for recognizing and handling them. The church of Scientology frowns on any discussion of spiritual activity or personal gains from auditing. In the independent field there is a much more enlightened view of the need to discuss these topics openly.
Even so, a discussion of personal wins and the properties and behavior of spiritual entities can quickly exceed the reality levels of the average listener.
Does that mean we should not share our hard won spiritual knowledge? I believe that spiritual knowledge is like fire, it transforms what it touches and the results depend on what use it is put to. I do not feel that ignorance is a safe position to hold.
For example, in my auditing as an independent auditor, I learned more about entities and their behavior than in all of my years auditing on OT Levels I-7.
This was when I began looking at the earlier materials written by Ron Hubbard and others and saw much that never made it into the official OT Levels.
That encouraged me to make the data my own and to read everything on the subject and take what I could personally verify as valid. I am not going to list the LRH references for you as there may be other references equally as valid.
I encourage you to read everything written about entities, Targs, circuits, valences, Identities, bodies in pawn, monitors, galactic overlords and anything else of a spiritual nature and to use this data to evaluate what you run into when you ask a pc what is occurring in his space or his body or is affecting him from afar.
You may discover, as I have, that most entities are actually trying to assist you in some way. Their efforts to help you may be crippling you or confusing you or driving you crazy, but you will find in many cases this is the only form of help they can conceive of.
You don’t have to date/locate a damn thing, just get in comm with the being and grant beingness! If you keep communicating to them with ARC, they eventually come to present time. Most will move off while others may wish to stick around and help. This opens the door to a whole new world as there is little written on the care and management of entities.
(Some people have even established relationships with entities who will perform such chores as fetching information and reminding them of important events. That is a topic for another post.)
A long time ago Ron said something about entities should be audited like any other pc, using the Auditors code and granting beingness, but I never found this in the OT level materials.
The information I saw spoke about using intention to handle BTs and clusters and the thetan hand technique where you scrape the beings off you. (“Take that! You icky BT, you!”)
Using the term BT depersonalizes the entities in my estimation. I prefer to use the term entity when referring to them when auditing a PreOT. That tends to cover the gamut of the entities you run into, as some are solid as stones and others are big and strong enough to take over for the pc when she or he goes out of present time.
There are even times when auditing someone whose OT case (entities) have been heavily restimulated that I found myself getting direct communication from the entities or a cluster of entities. The pc or PreOT was basically channelling the communication from the entities. The persons voice would change and the entities would tell the story from their perspective. Once the entities were handled, the pc would be able to take over again.
I also found to my surprise, that people who had never been adjudicated as clear could be run as NOTS pcs if they and their entities were granted beingness. These people had gone clear long ago and their entities had been subjected to Sec checks, Dianetic auditing, correction lists, and Grades processes.
Most of the entities had Out Int and were out list and were very suspicious of any auditing. Many of these situations were brought under control in less than 10 hours of high ARC OT repairs. Most of these pcs and all of the entities had never been acknowledged. Having a terminal that cared for them and actually listened to them made all the difference in the world.
I invite you to discover what can be done for these pcs who have been mauled and abused by church auditing. It might open up a whole new life for those you audit.